It is likely that you have started two identical job-processing servers (JPS) on the same computer; this can cause unexpected behavior. If this is the case, ensure you are running only one processing server.
If your orthorectified images appear compressed and disproportionate, your cell width and height of your chip are probably reversed in your camera-calibration XML file. To fix this, switch the width and height values.
If your images seem proportionate, but do not align along their edges, you may have chosen the wrong kappa-rotation units. With flight paths that run north-south or east-west, kappa values in degrees will be in increments of about 90 degrees. If they are in gradians, the values will be in increments of 100.
Your principal point is incorrect. If you have rotated the kappa value in your EO file, you must also adjust the principal point in your camera-calibration file using the information in the following table.
| Original PP | Kappa Rotation | Modified PP |
|---|---|---|
PP_X = x_mm |
0 deg clockwise | PP_X = x_mm |
PP_X = x_mm |
90 deg clockwise | PP_X = y_mm |
PP_X = x_mm |
270 deg clockwise | PP_X = -y_mm |
PP_X = x_mm |
180 deg clockwise | PP_X = -x_mm |
If you are convinced that your DEM should overlap your input data, it is likely that you have a projection mismatch. Ensure all of your projection and coordinate information is correct, and then try running the process again. Try plotting your EO data over the DEM in CATALYST Professional Focus.
Output resolution plays a large role in file size and, consequently, in processing times. Incorrect output resolution is most often the cause of slow processing. If your resolution is too high, processing will likely be quite slow, as a lot of information is being written to disk. Ensure that your resolution matches the units that apply to the map projection; for example, the units of UTM are meter, and the units of most State Plane projections are feet. If your resolution is correct and you are still experiencing slow processing speeds, there may be issues with disk speed or network access.
You have likely chosen an incorrect NoData value for the edges of your mosaic, and color balancing is using this data.
If your data was acquired at varying times of the year, it is likely that there are significant changes in vegetation color due to moisture and growth. Try running the Mosaic Preparation module without normalization or color balancing, and then compare this output to your previous result. This will provide a good indication of the quality of color balancing. There are times when image differences are too great to correct automatically. If it is clear that color balancing is still poor, ensure that your NoData value is correct during the mosaic-preparation stage.
This is most often caused by too aggressive an adaptive filter. Try running adaptive filtering with a higher percentage of image coverage; for best results, use a value above 40.
When "strips" occur along the flight lines, your georeferencing between images may be incorrect due to an incorrect value in the camera-calibration or EO file. Ensure that your images align, and, if you are still experiencing stripping, try running hot-spot normalization in addition to color balancing.
© PCI Geomatics Enterprises, Inc.®, 2026. All rights reserved.